By Denying Scientific Principles One May Maintain Any Paradox

How You Learn To Deny Scientific Principles

“By denying scientific principles, one may maintain any paradox.” — Galileo Galilei

Are you supporting paradoxical thinking to maintain the boundaries of your beliefs?

If you are a believer in one of the dominant religions, you will find it more difficult to deny the overwhelming amount of scientific information.   Denying facts in the modern age takes a lot of work.   It creates several interesting paradoxes for the culture.

A paradox involves contradictory-yet-interrelated elements. A paradoxical conclusion will arise from inconsistent or contradictory premises and arguments. However, this is precisely what we find in the world’s most popular religions.

What are the most popular religions? These are the Abrahamic religions, (1) the Semitic origin, including Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.  They contain multiple contradictions and deny the very sources of their origins, yet they hold control over the cultural narrative.

Learning To Deny Scientific Principles

Many people deal with paradoxes in their everyday lives. It is the clash between science and religious mythology, and this battle has been going on for centuries.  It proves that mythology and superstition are powerful, mind-numbing elements of the pre-scientific world.

Galileo di Vincenzo Bonaiuti de’ Galilei (2) was a freethinker.  He was way ahead of time as an astronomer, physicist, and engineer.  Some call him the father of observational astronomy and modern physics.  They also credit him with creating the scientific method and modern science.  Before psychology was born, Galileo recognized the effects of cognitive dissonance.   He saw it as “maintaining a paradox.”

“By denying scientific principles, one may maintain any paradox.” — Galileo Galilei

Maintaining a paradox requires unbelief.  It takes a lot of work to deny facts and ideas which threaten your worldview.  Does this sound familiar?  Do you deny scientific, historical, and logical facts to maintain your belief in religion?

“It is startling to realize how much unbelief is necessary to make belief possible. What we know as blind faith is sustained by innumerable unbeliefs.” — Eric Hoffer

Does your belief system teach you to deny any scientific or logical reasoning that threatens your sacred ground?  Defending your holy ground is stressful, especially when it is illogical.  A paradox creates doubt, and doubt can be uncomfortable, even scary.

When we encounter something that threatens our worldview, we have an internal conflict.  Which position is correct?  So, to reduce discomfort, religion teaches us to deny any threat. Maintaining a paradox is challenging but possible. “Denial” is a powerful tool.

By Denying Scientific Principles One May Maintain Any Paradox

As we mentioned earlier, Galileo was very perceptive.  He identified the cause and effect of cognitive dissonance long before creating modern psychology.

Cognitive dissonance is a psychological term. This is the mental distress of reconciling things that conflict with your current worldview.  When someone experiences cognitive dissonance, it can be terrifying.  It shakes the foundation of your reality.

When something doesn’t fit into the existing worldview or paradigm, it causes mental and physical pain.  So, we must make some choices. One must either reject the new data or change their existing paradigm to align with the new information.

An open-minded person moves through this conflict quickly. They use common sense and logical reasoning to sift through the new information. Through critical thinking, either reject the new information or change their paradigm if the new data is valid.  An open-minded person can change their opinions about reality when encountering new accurate data.

For those entrenched in belief systems based on mythology, cognitive dissonance is not just painful; it’s scary.  When your identity is tied to the belief system, it triggers fear.  If what we believe is wrong, it fractures their identity.    They confine friendships with those who share the same narrow cultural narrative. But it is hard to break free when you live in a culture where the dominant cultural narrative is controlling and unhealthy.  Outward expressions of descent may not be possible.  In some cultures, leaving the recognized religion is punishable by death.

Where Cognitive Dissonance Starts

The condition we know as cognitive dissonance can begin in childhood.  Parents pass down lifestyle, religious, political, and personal opinions, which conflict with reality.  Children trust their parents, so they live in a state of constant stress.

Beliefs and prejudices become ingrained with constant indoctrination.  Religious institutions use powerful brainwashing tactics like self-hypnosis and group hypnosis.  They reward the repetition of dogma when followers parrot religious prejudice.  They punish independent thinking, thus maintaining a paradox between belief and reality. It’s all about protecting their customer base.

As you might imagine, constant brainwashing accomplishes this task.  To maintain a paradox, one must immerse themselves in groupthink manipulation tactics.  That is why some religions semi-weekly meetings.  Otherwise, the conflict between fact and fiction causes mental and physical discomfort.

It can become a catalyst for more profound psychological harm, leading youth to the onset of schizophrenia.  It leads to doubt and depression, which can also spiral downward. As a result, it is imperative to keep up the group hypnosis, denying the facts that conflict with their beliefs.  Deny any fact or idea that contradicts the religion’s mythology.

This condition is what Galileo observed as a paradox. Many people learn to deny the facts that conflict with their beliefs. Don’t let this be you.

How the Paradox Conflict Manifests

When an open-minded person encounters a paradox, they reason out the conflict.  They will alter their beliefs to incorporate this additional evidence. However, a religious person fights to maintain the paradox. Again, by denying scientific principles, one may maintain any contradiction.

The profoundly religious will reject anything that threatens their paradigm’s mythology or doctrine.  It doesn’t matter if the thoughts and behaviors are irrational or illogical.  They become agitated and angry because their beliefs are their very identity.

For instance, when someone believes that everyone outside of their belief system is evil, they view outsiders as enemies.  However, if they encounter an outsider, it makes them uncomfortable. They don’t know why they feel this way.  They run into a paradox.  Someone reasonable doesn’t believe the same things they do. It causes physical or mental distress.  That’s because outsiders are supposed to be unreasonable and evil.

Because of cognitive dissonance, they can’t reconcile the outsider being anything but evil.   The outsider isn’t acting the way they expected, so they face a personal paradox.  How can someone evil be so nice? They must either accept the flaws in their belief system and change them or reinforce their belief system in some manner that will make that belief more extreme, such as avoiding the outsider.

Sadly, what often happens is they go to their trusted spiritual leader?  They explain how they met a friendly person outside the flock.  The pastor will tell them this is an attempted deception of the Devil, so they must reject the outsider.

Protecting the belief system’s partitions and boundaries is the most important goal.  They must isolate you from anyone that might expose you to view facts.  Otherwise, it would undermine their control.  This is the tactic of brainwashing and a significant component of groupthink manipulation.

How To Stop Maintaining a Paradox

The conflict between science and the mythology of religion causes cognitive dissonance.  Maintaining your sanity requires one of two options.  Immerse further in groupthink manipulation to block out the facts from the fiction.  One maintains paradox by submission to propaganda.

Not all religions are harmful, only those that create boundaries and restrictions dictating values and thought.  Some religions have more limitations than others. For example, Taoism and Paganism have the fewest constraints over freethinking. These systems encourage the exploration and development of your path.  It contrasts with the boundaries of Western organized religion. These are the Abrahamic religions, (1) the Semitic origin, including Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. They are a rebranding of earlier Egyptian, Babylonian, Persian, and Assyrian mystery religions.

You don’t have to join a religion to engage in spiritual exploration.  All you need to do is to learn and practice the processes.  There’s a vast difference between religion and spiritual exploration.

In Conclusion

By denying scientific principles, one may maintain any paradox. When belief is more important than the truth, anyone can hold a paradox.  All it takes is constant exposure to groupthink manipulation.

Thanks for reading this article. We welcome your opinion, so don’t hesitate to comment or email us.  We hope it provides some food for thought.  You can find more mind-opening topics on our blog.

Find about our mission at the “about” and the frequently asked questions tab FAQ.

If spiritual exploration is of interest, check out the virtual learning sessions link. Our blended learning process is at the core of our mission, and it aligns with the Hero’s Journey (3).

If you register on our site, you will get special offers, online training discounts, and free unadvertised downloads.  We comply with all GDPR guidelines and never share or sell your contact data.

Please donate to support our mission of providing these ancient spiritual development tools.

References

(1) Abrahamic Religions, Wikipedia
(2) Galileo Galilei, Wikipedia
(3) Joseph Campbell & Joseph Campbell’s book The Hero’s Journey, Wikipedia

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *