confusing choice with prejudice

Confusing Choice with Prejudice

Confusing choice with prejudice differs like night and day.  Learn how and why this is important.

Confusing choice with prejudice is a common tactic. Many people use this, but don’t know it.  That’s because this tactic has become a part of their thinking process.  It cloaks bias and harmful intent as a seemingly neutral premise. Let’s look at how this works so you can spot the tactic.  You also need to learn why this is a dangerous slippery slope.

Confusing Choice to Hide Intent

Choice

A choice is a decision with a neutral impact.  We choose when there is more than one option.  In fact, we all make several choices in the course of our everyday activities.  These everyday neutral choices are significant for the absence of harmful effects.  In other words, these choices do not have ethical or moral implications.  So, this type of decision involves discretion.  But, regardless of which option we choose the outcome is harmless.

For instance, deciding which vegetable to eat would normally be a neutral choice.  That is, as long as the decision does not have a harmful outcome.  So, for example, if you steal the vegetable that has a harmful effect.  Stealing is harmful to the person who owns them.  So, it’s not a choice without harmful or negative ethical consequences.  On the other hand, if the vegetables are from your garden then the decision is likely neutral.  Choice results in a decision without harmful effects.

Prejudice

On the surface, Prejudice appears similar to the concept of choice.  It’s a decision between several options. However, decisions made with underlying negative prejudice result in harmful outcomes.  Sometimes the harmful outcome may not be immediately clear.  The underlying prejudice creates a negative impact.  This can take several forms of discrimination such as gender, ethnic, and racial bias.  It could also incite physical harm and provide justification for the violence.

So, it’s logical to conclude that prejudice is at the root of harmful intent. The intent of our decisions is woven into the fabric of our worldview. If you have a worldview with negative bias it will color all of your decisions.  Furthermore, the underlying intent becomes your rationale for making value judgments. And, this is exactly how prejudice becomes a rational neutral choice. The value judgment of the worldview promotes prejudice.  And, people with this mindset rarely realize they are doing this.

Choice and prejudice differ in the same way discretion and discrimination differ.  Discretion is a choice. For instance, deciding what vegetable eat is a routine decision.  This type of choice is neutral and absent harmful prejudice. Whereas, discrimination is a choice with an adverse impact even if the discrimination is seemingly unintentional. Either form of prejudice comes from a worldview which promotes this confusion. Prejudice results in decisions with harmful outcomes.  This may seem semantics but the results differ like night and day.

Important Differences

Hopefully, you can see how choice and prejudice differ. To spot the use of this tactic you need to identify the intent behind the decision.  Delve into the premise of the argument.  The argument should be presented in a way to show the underlying intent.  So, one way to spot prejudice hiding as a neutral choice is the lack of clarity in the intent.  Do they tell you why this option is correct? Is the outcome of the decision neutral or does it result in harmful effects?

In the final analysis, it’s wrong to promote a premise with prejudiced intent as a neutral choice.  A logical argument needs to contain valid premises.  Also, a choice which results in harmful outcomes is a breach of common ethics. Harming others is always wrong.  While an ordinary mistake may reveal a lack of knowledge or attention, an ethical mistake results from the coloring of perception with prejudice.

Harmful results are the product of a worldview colored by prejudice.   So, the obvious question is what creates a worldview built on prejudice?  Prejudice is at the root of extremist ideology and hate. It’s a slippery slope you should try to avoid.

“Because you didn’t come here to make the choice, you’ve already made it. You’re here to try to understand *why* you made it. I thought you’d have figured that out by now.” — The Oracle from The Matrix

Confusing Choice with Prejudice

As mentioned above, confusing choice with prejudice creates a slippery slope. You’ve likely made decisions that are based on some type of prejudice. Now we want you to see why. That’s the only way you stop from doing it. Most people believe their decisions are correct. People use the underlying bias of their worldview to justify their decisions.

Not surprisingly, religions and political entities use these tactics. In this way, they can justify harmful behavior from war and genocide to gender mutilation. They accomplish this through a brainwashing technique known as groupthink manipulation. It’s the cultural programming tool of choice. That’s because it enables them to program values and prejudices which support their point of view.  That’s because prejudice is one of the main enemies of progress.

Sadly, many submit to this programming. And, as a result, believe the negative prejudice is correct because it comes from a source they trust. The source can present premises and resulting arguments with extreme bias.  Sometimes people will argue all decisions are choice regardless of intent or outcome.  This is an attempt to hide prejudice and bias. Don’t let them fool you with this smokescreen.  Point out how the results differ.  Hate and prejudice are always harmful.

Here’s how this issue comes up.  For example, your religious leader asks for support of a health policy which affects the community.  However, it’s really about excluding treatment to certain people.  The exclusion would be harmful.  This creates an ethical dilemma. If you go along, supporting a harmful act.  Or, do you reject this policy?  Rejecting this policy would go against the wishes of your religious leader.  If you do this, you risk losing membership or worse. What do you do?

In Conclusion

Confusing choice with prejudice is a tactic you need to avoid.  It’s a misuse of an argument with the power to distort logic and values.  There are some practical things you can do.  Don’t watch TV news and religious programming.  Both of these are sources of groupthink manipulation tactics.  These mind control methods promote an emotional response and plant bias and prejudice thinking.  Remember hate isn’t a neutral choice.  It’s a decision based on bias and prejudice which has harmful consequences.

If this article resonates, there are more on our blog.  Also, you may be interested in learning about our blended learning process.  This is our curriculum which we use to teach several mind-expanding tools.  It also aligns the Hero’s Journey.  This is the term Joseph Campbell gave the pattern of consciousness development.  Our learning process is available in two forms.  You can take part in the virtual learning module or in our workshops.

While you are here please also check out our page FAQ for information about our mission.  And, please consider donating to support our mission of providing these ancient spiritual development tools.

Image by Unsplash.

You Might Also Like

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *